i5-8265U vs Celeron M 390

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Core i5
Power efficiencyno data23.60
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$297

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate400 MHz4 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data123 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FCBGA1528
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 8th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M 390 102
i5-8265U 11.02
+826%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 15 Watt

i5-8265U has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 390 and Core i5-8265U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390
Intel Core i5-8265U
Core i5-8265U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1200 votes

Rate Core i5-8265U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 390 or Core i5-8265U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.