Xeon w5-3535X vs Celeron M 383

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,689

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads140
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data52.5 MB
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 40
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 300 Watt

Celeron M 383 has 5900% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-3535X, on the other hand, has 1900% more physical cores and 3900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 383 is a notebook processor while Xeon w5-3535X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 383 and Xeon w5-3535X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 383
Celeron M 383
Intel Xeon w5-3535X
Xeon w5-3535X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 383 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w5-3535X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 383 or Xeon w5-3535X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.