Xeon Gold 6438Y+ vs Celeron M 383
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 110 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 11.25 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.35 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data | 10 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,141 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 383 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 383 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 383 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 383 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 205 Watt |
Celeron M 383 has 4000% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6438Y+, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 383 and Intel Xeon Gold 6438Y+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 383 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
