Ryzen 3 7320U vs Celeron M 383
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1141 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 35.08 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 20 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron M 383 has 200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 7320U, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 383 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
