PRO A10-9700 vs Celeron M 360
Aggregate performance score
PRO A10-9700 outperforms Celeron M 360 by a whopping 1477% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3620 | 2097 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.38 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | no data | 27 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | no data | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| Out-of-band client management | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2400 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 360 and PRO A10-9700.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.13 | 2.05 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M 360 has 209.5% lower power consumption.
PRO A10-9700, on the other hand, has a 1476.9% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD PRO A10-9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 360 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 360 is a notebook processor while PRO A10-9700 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
