i5-12450H vs Celeron M 360
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-12450H outperforms Celeron M 360 by a whopping 7543% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3319 | 727 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 2 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | Intel Alder Lake-P |
Power efficiency | 0.63 | 22.50 |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Alder Lake-H (2022) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 217 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | FCBGA1744 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | - | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | - | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel Processors |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.2 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 48 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12.1 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.14 | 10.70 |
Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 360 has 114.3% lower power consumption.
i5-12450H, on the other hand, has a 7542.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
The Core i5-12450H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 360 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 360 and Core i5-12450H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.