E1 Micro-6200T vs Celeron M 353
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 3030 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | AMD E-Series |
Power efficiency | no data | 9.10 |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Mullins (2014) |
Release date | no data | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
L2 cache | no data | 1024 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | FT3b |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 3.95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
E1 Micro-6200T has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.