Intel Celeron N2940 vs M 353

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

Comparing Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release dateno data22 May 2014 (9 years old)
Current priceno data$377

Technical specs

Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz2.25 GHz
Bus support400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron M 353 423
Celeron N2940 1150
+172%

N2940 outperforms M 353 by 172% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Advantages and disadvantages


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Celeron N2940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353
Intel Celeron N2940
Celeron N2940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 19 votes

Rate Intel Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 85 votes

Rate Intel Celeron N2940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 353 or Celeron N2940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.