Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Celeron M 330
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 330 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 538 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | no data |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 330 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 7.3 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 330 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 2424 ‑ 3696 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 330 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 330 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 330 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 2424 Watt |
Celeron M 330 has 10000% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 330 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 330 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
