Ryzen 3 7335U vs Celeron M 320
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1114 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.80 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 320 and Ryzen 3 7335U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 Cache | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 320 and Ryzen 3 7335U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and Ryzen 3 7335U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 320 and Ryzen 3 7335U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and Ryzen 3 7335U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 320 and Ryzen 3 7335U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1800 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 320 and Ryzen 3 7335U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron M 320 has 16.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 7335U, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 320 and AMD Ryzen 3 7335U. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
