Pentium N4200 vs Celeron M 320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Pentium
Power efficiencyno data21.45
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release dateno data1 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$161

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache512 KB L2 Cache2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography130 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FSB parity-no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 505
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data18

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 6 Watt

Pentium N4200 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 320 and Pentium N4200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 320
Celeron M 320
Intel Pentium N4200
Pentium N4200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 712 votes

Rate Pentium N4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 320 or Pentium N4200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.