Pentium 350 vs Celeron M 320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateno data21 November 2011 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache512 KB L2 Cache3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C76 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FDIno data-
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium 350 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 320 is a notebook processor while Pentium 350 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 320 and Pentium 350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 320
Celeron M 320
Intel Pentium 350
Pentium 350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Pentium 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 320 or Pentium 350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.