Apple M2 Max vs Celeron M 320
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 540 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.19 |
| Designer | Intel | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | no data |
| Release date | no data | 17 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 320 and M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 3.3 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 Cache | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 67000 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 320 and M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 79 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 320 and M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and M2 Max are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 79 Watt |
Celeron M 320 has 229.2% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 320 and Apple M2 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
