Ryzen 3 3300 vs Celeron M 310
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | no data | March 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 3 3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 3 3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | H-PBGA479, PPGA478 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 3 3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 3 3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 3 3300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 3 3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 50 Watt |
Celeron M 310 has 108.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 3300, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 310 and AMD Ryzen 3 3300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 310 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3300 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
