Pentium P6100 vs Celeron M 310
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3162 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Intel Pentium |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.60 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | no data | 26 September 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $12 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 310 and Pentium P6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 1.0 |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 1 × 2.5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 81+114 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 384 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 310 and Pentium P6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | H-PBGA479, PPGA478 | PGA988 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 310 and Pentium P6100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | 32 Bit | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 310 and Pentium P6100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 310 and Pentium P6100 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 310 and Pentium P6100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 17.051 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 667 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 310 and Pentium P6100 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 310 and Pentium P6100.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron M 310 has 45.8% lower power consumption.
Pentium P6100, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 310 and Intel Pentium P6100. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
