Xeon X5355 vs Celeron J4125
Aggregate performance score
Celeron J4125 outperforms Xeon X5355 by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1962 | 2276 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.77 | 0.04 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 17.65 | 0.99 |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Clovertown (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 14 November 2006 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $1,172 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron J4125 has 14325% better value for money than Xeon X5355.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 0.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 63 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | LGA771,PLGA771 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | N/A |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.94 | 1.30 |
| Recency | 4 November 2019 | 14 November 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 120 Watt |
Celeron J4125 has a 49.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.
The Celeron J4125 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5355 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron J4125 is a desktop processor while Xeon X5355 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Xeon X5355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
