Xeon W-10855M vs Celeron J4125

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86
Xeon W-10855M
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.94
+327%

Xeon W-10855M outperforms Celeron J4125 by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1998952
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.57no data
Market segmentDesktop processorMobile workstation
Seriesno dataIntel Comet Lake
Power efficiency17.5116.61
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache56 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB12 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.2 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4125 1.86
Xeon W-10855M 7.94
+327%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4125 2957
Xeon W-10855M 12605
+326%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4125 346
Xeon W-10855M 1497
+333%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4125 964
Xeon W-10855M 5901
+512%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron J4125 1394
Xeon W-10855M 6231
+347%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 7.94
Integrated graphics card 0.87 5.58
Recency 4 November 2019 13 May 2020
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron J4125 has 350% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-10855M, on the other hand, has a 326.9% higher aggregate performance score, 541.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 months, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Xeon W-10855M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J4125 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-10855M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Xeon W-10855M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
Intel Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1528 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 67 votes

Rate Xeon W-10855M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or Xeon W-10855M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.