Ryzen 9 9950X vs Celeron J4125

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86
Ryzen 9 9950X
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
41.75
+2145%

Ryzen 9 9950X outperforms Celeron J4125 by a whopping 2145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199858
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.5665.08
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency17.6023.24
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 9950X has 1071% better value for money than Celeron J4125.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size93 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090AM5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600AMD Radeon Graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes624
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4125 1.86
Ryzen 9 9950X 41.75
+2145%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4125 2957
Ryzen 9 9950X 66315
+2143%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron J4125 1394
Ryzen 9 9950X 23568
+1591%

Blender(-)

Celeron J4125 2391
+3005%
Ryzen 9 9950X 77

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron J4125 455
Ryzen 9 9950X 2548
+460%

7-Zip Single

Celeron J4125 2369
Ryzen 9 9950X 7852
+231%

7-Zip

Celeron J4125 7494
Ryzen 9 9950X 160423
+2041%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron J4125 89
Ryzen 9 9950X 409
+361%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron J4125 340
Ryzen 9 9950X 2451
+621%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Celeron J4125 68
Ryzen 9 9950X 357
+423%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Celeron J4125 7856
+6558%
Ryzen 9 9950X 118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 41.75
Integrated graphics card 0.87 1.98
Recency 4 November 2019 15 August 2024
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 170 Watt

Celeron J4125 has 1600% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 9950X, on the other hand, has a 2144.6% higher aggregate performance score, 127.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 9950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Ryzen 9 9950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
Ryzen 9 9950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1528 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 357 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or Ryzen 9 9950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.