Processor U300E vs Celeron J4125
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1982 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.36 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 17.65 | no data |
Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 6 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 93 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1090 | Intel BGA 1744 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel UHD Graphics 48EU |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | 8 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 November 2019 | 4 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 4 | 5 |
Threads | 4 | 6 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron J4125 has 50% lower power consumption.
Processor U300E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 25% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J4125 is a desktop processor while Processor U300E is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Processor U300E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.