Athlon X4 740 vs Celeron J4125

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.91
+12.4%

Celeron J4125 outperforms Athlon X4 740 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and Athlon X4 740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19262007
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date4 November 2019 (4 years ago)2 October 2012 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and Athlon X4 740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)192K
L2 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size93 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and Athlon X4 740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1090FM2
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Athlon X4 740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Athlon X4 740 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Athlon X4 740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1866
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Athlon X4 740.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4125 1.91
+12.4%
Athlon X4 740 1.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4125 2955
+12.5%
Athlon X4 740 2626

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4125 346
Athlon X4 740 399
+15.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4125 962
Athlon X4 740 969
+0.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 1.70
Recency 4 November 2019 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron J4125 has a 12.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4125 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 740 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Athlon X4 740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
AMD Athlon X4 740
Athlon X4 740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1472 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 180 votes

Rate Athlon X4 740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or Athlon X4 740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.