Xeon E5620 vs Celeron J4105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.90

Xeon E5620 outperforms Celeron J4105 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19911810
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.110.08
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency17.332.68
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4105 has 2538% better value for money than Xeon E5620.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.66 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size93 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C78 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.90
Xeon E5620 2.35
+23.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2904
Xeon E5620 3592
+23.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4105 325
Xeon E5620 367
+12.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4105 920
Xeon E5620 1468
+59.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 2.35
Recency 11 December 2017 16 March 2010
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 80 Watt

Celeron J4105 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5620, on the other hand, has a 23.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

The Xeon E5620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5620 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Xeon E5620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Xeon E5620
Xeon E5620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 302 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 109 votes

Rate Xeon E5620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Xeon E5620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.