Pentium 3558U vs Celeron J4105

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83
+182%
Pentium 3558U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.65

Celeron J4105 outperforms Pentium 3558U by a whopping 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19942744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Pentium
Power efficiency17.324.10
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$161

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache56 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Smart Connectno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data-
AMTno data9.5
Matrix Storageno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes610
PCI supportno data-
USB revision2.0/3.03.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Integrated IDEno data-
Number of USB ports84
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.83
+182%
Pentium 3558U 0.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2905
+180%
Pentium 3558U 1036

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4105 270
+109%
Pentium 3558U 129

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4105 73
+9%
Pentium 3558U 67

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 0.65
Recency 11 December 2017 1 January 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J4105 has a 181.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3558U in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Pentium 3558U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Pentium 3558U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Pentium 3558U
Pentium 3558U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 302 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 105 votes

Rate Pentium 3558U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Pentium 3558U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.