PRO A10-8750B vs Celeron J4105
Aggregated performance score
Celeron J4105 outperforms PRO A10-8750B by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1866 | 1871 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.53 | 0.19 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Architecture codename | Gemini Lake (2019) | Godaveri (2014−2018) |
Release date | 11 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 29 September 2015 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Current price | $743 (6.9x MSRP) | $190 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron J4105 has 179% better value for money than PRO A10-8750B.
Technical specs
Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 4096 KB |
L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | no data | 245 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 71 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 2,411 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1090 | FM2+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
FRTC | no data | 1 |
FreeSync | no data | 1 |
PowerTune | no data | + |
DualGraphics | no data | 1 |
TrueAudio | no data | + |
PowerNow | no data | + |
PowerGating | no data | + |
Out-of-band client management | no data | + |
VirusProtect | no data | + |
RAID | no data | + |
HSA | no data | 1 |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
IOMMU 2.0 | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR4 | DDR3-2133 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
Number of pipelines | no data | 512 |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | no data |
Enduro | no data | + |
Switchable graphics | no data | 1 |
UVD | no data | + |
VCE | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | + |
HDMI | + | + |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Vulkan | no data | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | 16 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron J4105 outperforms PRO A10-8750B by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron J4105 outperforms PRO A10-8750B by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
PRO A10-8750B outperforms Celeron J4105 by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron J4105 outperforms PRO A10-8750B by 4% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.88 | 1.86 |
Integrated graphics card | 0.86 | |
Recency | 11 December 2017 | 29 September 2015 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 95 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and PRO A10-8750B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.