EPYC 9135 vs Celeron J4105

Place in the ranking	2011	96
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.06	29.29
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	17.32	17.30
Architecture codename	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Turin (2024)
Release date	11 December 2017 (7 years ago)	10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9135 has 1322% better value for money than Celeron J4105.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads	4	32
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.5 GHz	4.3 GHz
Multiplier	15	no data
L1 cache	56 KB (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	4 MB (shared)	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	4 MB	64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Die size	93 mm²	2x 70.6 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	16,630 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	2
Socket	FCBGA1090	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Response	-	no data
GPIO	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
MPX	+	-
Identity Protection	+	-
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR5
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	38.397 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel UHD Graphics 600	N/A
Max video memory	8 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	no data
Execution Units	12	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
MIPI-DSI	+	no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support

no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	6	128
USB revision	2.0/3.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data
Integrated LAN	-	no data
UART	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.83

EPYC 9135 36.56
+1898%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2900

EPYC 9135 58070
+1902%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.83	36.56
Recency	11 December 2017	10 October 2024
Physical cores	4	16
Threads	4	32
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	200 Watt

Celeron J4105 has 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 1897.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.