i7-875K vs Celeron J4105

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.90

Core i7-875K outperforms Celeron J4105 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19911937
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.110.08
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency17.331.95
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)30 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$486

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4105 has 2538% better value for money than i7-875K.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size93 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.90
i7-875K 2.03
+6.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2904
i7-875K 3100
+6.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4105 325
i7-875K 509
+56.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4105 920
i7-875K 1766
+92%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 2.03
Recency 11 December 2017 30 May 2010
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron J4105 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

i7-875K, on the other hand, has a 6.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Core i7-875K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Core i7-875K
Core i7-875K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 302 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 63 votes

Rate Core i7-875K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Core i7-875K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.