Ultra 7 265H vs Celeron J4105

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2039not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.89no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency17.25no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)no data
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data2
Threads416
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache56 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache4 MB24 MB
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel® Arc™ 140T GPU
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz2.3 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.44.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes628
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 1 January 2025
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 115 Watt

Celeron J4105 has 1050% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 265H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Core Ultra 7 265H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Core Ultra 7 265H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 313 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Core Ultra 7 265H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.