M-5Y31 vs Celeron J4105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.89
+53.7%

Celeron J4105 outperforms M-5Y31 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19632309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.46no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core M
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Broadwell (2014−2019)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)1 December 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz0.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1234
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response-+
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics 5300
Max video memory8 GB16 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz850 MHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.2/12
OpenGL4.44.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes612
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.89
+53.7%
M-5Y31 1.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2908
+53.1%
M-5Y31 1899

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4105 270
+29.8%
M-5Y31 208

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4105 73
M-5Y31 98
+34.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 1.23
Integrated graphics card 0.87 1.03
Recency 11 December 2017 1 December 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron J4105 has a 53.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores.

M-5Y31, on the other hand, has 18.4% faster integrated GPU, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y31 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Core M-5Y31 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Core M-5Y31, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Core M-5Y31
Core M-5Y31

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 299 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate Core M-5Y31 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Core M-5Y31, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.