Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Celeron J4105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.88
+24.5%

Celeron J4105 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18982051
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.852.80
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronCore 2 Quad (Desktop)
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$400 (3.7x MSRP)$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Quad Q9550 has 229% better value for money than Celeron J4105.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.83 GHz
Bus supportno data1333 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB12288 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1090LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1,DDR2,DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.88
+24.5%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1.51

Celeron J4105 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J4105 2906
+24.1%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 2341

Celeron J4105 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 24% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J4105 324
Core 2 Quad Q9550 368
+13.6%

Core 2 Quad Q9550 outperforms Celeron J4105 by 14% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J4105 921
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1048
+13.8%

Core 2 Quad Q9550 outperforms Celeron J4105 by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 1.51
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 95 Watt

The Celeron J4105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Core 2 Quad Q9550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 290 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1831 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Core 2 Quad Q9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.