Celeron N2820 vs J4105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83
+472%
Celeron N2820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.32

Celeron J4105 outperforms Celeron N2820 by a whopping 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20103098
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.09no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency17.324.33
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.39 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache56 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connectno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHz756 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports85
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.83
+472%
Celeron N2820 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2899
+474%
Celeron N2820 505

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4105 325
+64.1%
Celeron N2820 198

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4105 922
+169%
Celeron N2820 343

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4105 270
+366%
Celeron N2820 58

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4105 73
+92.6%
Celeron N2820 38

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 0.32
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 11 December 2017 1 December 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron J4105 has a 471.9% higher aggregate performance score, 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N2820, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2820 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2820 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Celeron N2820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Celeron N2820
Celeron N2820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 311 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 46 votes

Rate Celeron N2820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Celeron N2820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.