Celeron G6900T vs J4105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.88
Celeron G6900T
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
2.59
+37.8%

G6900T outperforms J4105 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18981652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.86no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$400 (3.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel UHD Graphics 710
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Units1216

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes620
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.88
Celeron G6900T 2.59
+37.8%

G6900T outperforms J4105 by 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J4105 2906
Celeron G6900T 4003
+37.7%

G6900T outperforms J4105 by 38% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 2.59
Recency 11 December 2017 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

The Celeron G6900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Celeron G6900T
Celeron G6900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 291 vote

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 676 votes

Rate Celeron G6900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Celeron G6900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.