Atom Z3740 vs Celeron J4105

Place in the ranking	2011	3023
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.01	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	17.23	18.56
Architecture codename	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date	11 December 2017 (7 years ago)	27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.5 GHz	1.86 GHz
Multiplier	15	no data
L1 cache	56 KB (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	4 MB (shared)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	4 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Die size	93 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	90 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCBGA1090	UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Response	-	no data
GPIO	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	+
MPX	+	-
Identity Protection	+	+
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	8 GB	4 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	38.397 GB/s	17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory	8 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	667 MHz
Execution Units	12	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
MIPI-DSI	+	no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support

no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	6	no data
USB revision	2.0/3.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data
Integrated LAN	-	no data
UART	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.81
+364%

Atom Z3740 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2901
+367%

Atom Z3740 621

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.81	0.39
Integrated graphics card	0.87	0.77
Recency	11 December 2017	27 September 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	2 Watt

Celeron J4105 has a 364.1% higher aggregate performance score, 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z3740, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3740 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3740 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.