Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs Celeron J4025
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2529 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 8.78 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.87 | 1.99 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 170 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has 1600% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D, on the other hand, has 128.7% faster integrated GPU, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 9 9950X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
