Ryzen 5 8400F vs Celeron J4025

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.30
+1545%

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 1545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2526457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6764.44
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.8022.26
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 8400F has 2313% better value for money than Celeron J4025.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size93 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1090AM5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.30
+1545%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1477
Ryzen 5 8400F 24303
+1545%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 15.30
Recency 4 November 2019 1 April 2024
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron J4025 has 550% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 8400F, on the other hand, has a 1545.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 8400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 329 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.