Pentium G3240T vs Celeron J4025

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.96
Pentium G3240T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.08
+12.5%

Pentium G3240T outperforms Celeron J4025 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25072422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.68no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.752.81
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)no data
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache56 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache4 MB3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C66 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GB1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency700 MHz1.1 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
VGAno data+
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.1/12
OpenGL4.44.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T.

PCIe version2.0Up to 3.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.96
Pentium G3240T 1.08
+12.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1467
Pentium G3240T 1657
+13%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4025 332
Pentium G3240T 494
+48.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4025 540
Pentium G3240T 850
+57.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 1.08
Recency 4 November 2019 1 April 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron J4025 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

Pentium G3240T, on the other hand, has a 12.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Pentium G3240T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Pentium G3240T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Pentium G3240T
Pentium G3240T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 124 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 6 votes

Rate Pentium G3240T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Pentium G3240T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.