Pentium 4405Y vs Celeron J4025
Aggregate performance score
Pentium 4405Y outperforms Celeron J4025 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2529 | 2509 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Pentium |
| Power efficiency | 8.76 | 15.07 |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $161 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | OPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | 98.57 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1750 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | FCBGA1515 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| My WiFi | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Smart Response | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.861 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 515 |
| Max video memory | no data | 16 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 800 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | no data | N/A |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 10 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.92 | 0.95 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.87 | 1.65 |
| Recency | 4 November 2019 | 1 September 2015 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has an age advantage of 4 years.
Pentium 4405Y, on the other hand, has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, 89.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y.
Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Pentium 4405Y is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Pentium 4405Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
