Celeron N3350E vs J4025
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2526 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.67 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 8.80 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | no data |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| Smart Idle | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | - |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 650 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | + |
| OpenGL | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.87 | 0.77 |
| Recency | 4 November 2019 | 1 July 2019 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has 13% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 4 months.
Celeron N3350E, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Celeron N3350E is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
