Pentium G3220T vs Celeron J4005

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron J4005
2017
2 cores / 2 threads
1.00
Pentium G3220T
2013
2 cores / 2 threads
1.02
+2%

Pentium G3220T outperforms Celeron J4005 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23262313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.560.05
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)1 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$40
Current price$355 (3.3x MSRP)$161 (4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4005 has 1020% better value for money than Pentium G3220T.

Detailed Specifications

Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache112 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data177 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GB1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz1.1 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
VGAno data+
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.1/12
OpenGL4.44.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T.

PCIe version2.0Up to 3.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4005 1.00
Pentium G3220T 1.02
+2%

Pentium G3220T outperforms Celeron J4005 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J4005 1567
Pentium G3220T 1600
+2.1%

Pentium G3220T outperforms Celeron J4005 by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J4005 347
Pentium G3220T 480
+38.3%

Pentium G3220T outperforms Celeron J4005 by 38% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J4005 588
Pentium G3220T 840
+42.9%

Pentium G3220T outperforms Celeron J4005 by 43% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.00 1.02
Recency 11 December 2017 1 September 2013
Cost $107 $40
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4005 and Pentium G3220T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4005
Celeron J4005
Intel Pentium G3220T
Pentium G3220T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 151 vote

Rate Celeron J4005 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium G3220T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4005 or Pentium G3220T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.