EPYC 7313 vs Celeron J4005

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4005
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
1.00
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.08
+2408%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Celeron J4005 by a whopping 2408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2471202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0216.16
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.2515.03
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313 has 1484% better value for money than Celeron J4005.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier2030
L1 cache112 KB1 MB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB
L3 cache4 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size93 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1090SP3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes6128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4005 1.00
EPYC 7313 25.08
+2408%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4005 1553
EPYC 7313 39091
+2417%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4005 344
EPYC 7313 1487
+332%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4005 579
EPYC 7313 11432
+1874%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.00 25.08
Recency 11 December 2017 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 155 Watt

Celeron J4005 has 1450% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 2408% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4005 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4005 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4005 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4005
Celeron J4005
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 163 votes

Rate Celeron J4005 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4005 or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.