Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Celeron J3455E

VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2326not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency13.12no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameno dataHawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Release date1 July 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data4 MB
L3 cache2 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socketno dataFP7/FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataAES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.71 7.61
Recency 1 July 2019 6 January 2025
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron J3455E has 180% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 PRO 210, on the other hand, has 971.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron J3455E and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J3455E is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455E
Celeron J3455E
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210
Ryzen 3 PRO 210

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron J3455E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron J3455E and Ryzen 3 PRO 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.