i3-1115G4 vs Celeron J3455E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455E
2019
4 threads, 10 Watt
1.38
Core i3-1115G4
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
3.80
+175%

Core i3-1115G4 outperforms Celeron J3455E by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22331479
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency13.0612.84
Architecture codenameno dataTiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Release date1 July 2019 (5 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socketno dataFCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.25 GHz
Execution Units1248

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12.1
OpenGL+4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455E 1.38
i3-1115G4 3.80
+175%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3455E 2193
i3-1115G4 6034
+175%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J3455E 269
i3-1115G4 1567
+483%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J3455E 796
i3-1115G4 3058
+284%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 3.80
Integrated graphics card 0.77 5.58
Recency 1 July 2019 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron J3455E has 180% lower power consumption.

i3-1115G4, on the other hand, has a 175.4% higher aggregate performance score, 624.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-1115G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455E in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3455E is a desktop processor while Core i3-1115G4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455E and Core i3-1115G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455E
Celeron J3455E
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Core i3-1115G4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron J3455E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5403 votes

Rate Core i3-1115G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455E or Core i3-1115G4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.