Ultra 9 275HX vs Celeron J3455E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2267 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 13.06 | no data |
| Release date | 1 July 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 8 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA2114 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | - | no data |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 500 | Intel® Graphics |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 4 |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | + | 12 |
| OpenGL | + | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2019 | 1 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron J3455E has 450% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 275HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J3455E is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 275HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455E and Core Ultra 9 275HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
