i9-13900T vs Celeron J3455

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.42
Core i9-13900T
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 35 Watt
27.77
+1856%

Core i9-13900T outperforms Celeron J3455 by a whopping 1856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2202171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2244.40
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency13.3774.70
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900T has 20082% better value for money than Celeron J3455.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1296FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.65 GHz
Execution Units1232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12
OpenGL+4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes620
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455 1.42
i9-13900T 27.77
+1856%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3455 2256
i9-13900T 44111
+1855%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 27.77
Integrated graphics card 0.77 6.16
Recency 30 August 2016 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron J3455 has 250% lower power consumption.

i9-13900T, on the other hand, has a 1855.6% higher aggregate performance score, 700% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-13900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455 and Core i9-13900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455
Intel Core i9-13900T
Core i9-13900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 227 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 85 votes

Rate Core i9-13900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455 or Core i9-13900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.