Celeron 1000M vs J3455

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.46
+109%

J3455 outperforms 1000M by a whopping 109% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20662595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date30 August 2016 (7 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$86
Current price$189 (1.8x MSRP)$219 (2.5x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1 GHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455 1.46
+109%
Celeron 1000M 0.70

J3455 outperforms 1000M by 109% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J3455 2256
+110%
Celeron 1000M 1075

J3455 outperforms 1000M by 110% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J3455 254
Celeron 1000M 288
+13.4%

1000M outperforms J3455 by 13% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J3455 753
+52.7%
Celeron 1000M 493

J3455 outperforms 1000M by 53% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 0.70
Recency 30 August 2016 20 January 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $107 $86
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

The Celeron J3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455 and Celeron 1000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455
Intel Celeron 1000M
Celeron 1000M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 187 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 153 votes

Rate Celeron 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455 or Celeron 1000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.