Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Celeron J3355E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | no data | Hawk Point (2024) |
| Release date | 1 July 2019 (5 years ago) | 2 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | - | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| VT-i | - | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 500 | AMD Radeon 760M |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | + | no data |
| OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 14.90 |
| Recency | 1 July 2019 | 2 April 2024 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron J3355E has 180% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Embedded 8640U, on the other hand, has 1835.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J3355E is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded 8640U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355E and Ryzen Embedded 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
