EPYC 9965 vs Celeron J3355E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date1 July 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$14,813

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)192
Threads2384
Base clock speed2 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 192
Threads 2 384
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 500 Watt

Celeron J3355E has 4900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9965, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J3355E is a desktop processor while EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355E and EPYC 9965, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3355E
Celeron J3355E
AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron J3355E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3355E or EPYC 9965, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.