Atom Z3735G vs Celeron J3355

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3355
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.75
+53.1%
Atom Z3735G
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.49

Celeron J3355 outperforms Atom Z3735G by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26472891
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency7.1023.19
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$17

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.83 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data112 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1296UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB1 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data5.3 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHz646 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3355 0.75
+53.1%
Atom Z3735G 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3355 1197
+55.1%
Atom Z3735G 772

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 0.49
Recency 30 August 2016 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron J3355 has a 53.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J3355 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3355 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355
Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 58 votes

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 66 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3355 or Atom Z3735G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.