Ryzen 5 4600G vs Celeron J3160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.82
Ryzen 5 4600G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.39
+1167%

Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Celeron J3160 by a whopping 1167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2494699
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.6632.50
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameAirmont (2015−2016)Renoir (2020−2022)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)21 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$23 (0.2x MSRP)$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 4600G has 1858% better value for money than Celeron J3160.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports5no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3160 0.82
Ryzen 5 4600G 10.39
+1167%

Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Celeron J3160 by 1167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J3160 1262
Ryzen 5 4600G 16065
+1173%

Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Celeron J3160 by 1173% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J3160 170
Ryzen 5 4600G 1577
+828%

Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Celeron J3160 by 828% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J3160 495
Ryzen 5 4600G 6158
+1144%

Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Celeron J3160 by 1144% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 10.39
Recency 15 January 2016 21 July 2020
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 5 4600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3160 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3160 and Ryzen 5 4600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3160
Celeron J3160
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Ryzen 5 4600G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 52 votes

Rate Celeron J3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2309 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3160 or Ryzen 5 4600G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.