Processor N50 vs Celeron J3160
Aggregate performance score
Processor N50 outperforms Celeron J3160 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J3160 and Processor N50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2598 | 2019 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.03 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 12.61 | 27.66 |
Architecture codename | Airmont (2016) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 15 January 2016 (8 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J3160 and Processor N50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.24 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Bus type | IDI | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J3160 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3160 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | - | no data |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron J3160 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3160 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | + | + |
VT-i | - | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3160 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3160 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J3160 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | + | no data |
OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3160 and Processor N50.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | 9 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 5 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.83 | 1.82 |
Recency | 15 January 2016 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Celeron J3160 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Processor N50, on the other hand, has a 119.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Processor N50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3160 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron J3160 is a desktop processor while Processor N50 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3160 and Processor N50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.