Ultra 9 288V vs Celeron J3160

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.80
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52
+1465%

Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms Celeron J3160 by a whopping 1465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2620622
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency12.6239.50
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads48
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc Graphics 140V
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHz2.05 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12.2
OpenGL+4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes44
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports5no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3160 0.80
Ultra 9 288V 12.52
+1465%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3160 1271
Ultra 9 288V 19895
+1465%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 12.52
Recency 15 January 2016 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 30 Watt

Celeron J3160 has 400% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 1465% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3160 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3160 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3160 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3160
Celeron J3160
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 55 votes

Rate Celeron J3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3160 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.