EPYC 9654 vs Celeron J3060

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated4
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data10.18
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameAirmont (2015−2016)Genoa
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$11,805
Current price$187 (1.7x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.48 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170SP5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports5no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J3060 665
EPYC 9654 122091
+18260%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron J3060 by 18260% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J3060 173
EPYC 9654 1829
+957%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron J3060 by 957% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J3060 308
EPYC 9654 18566
+5928%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron J3060 by 5928% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 15 January 2016 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Cost $107 $11805
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 360 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J3060 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3060 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3060
Celeron J3060
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 118 votes

Rate Celeron J3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 979 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3060 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.